What for this kind of cinemas are churned out? We are forced to ask this question because there is absolutely no good effort from Ramprasad and his team. Firstly Ramprasad is not a hero material, secondly thorough change in the screenplay, some technical corrections and change of certain characters was necessary. This film focusing on the ills of cinema field and anger of the protagonist holds a mirror to the people living around. The tragedy of asking the people to come and watch Kannada cinema is a matter very close to this film in real sense.
Beaten twice in life Prithvi, Prasad, a fiancĂ© of Prasad and fiancĂ© mother again make an effort to succeed in cinema. Before that it is a love story of Prithvi and Sneha that is very poorly narrated.
After struggle - losing hard earned money in the film field believing a financier and a blade company later on the team of Prithvi win in giving a good cinema. Before this success they beg people to come and watch their film.
Ramprasad is not good in any department. He is the story, screenplay dialogue writer and hero of the film. Not having the required strength in him. Harsha is OK. Shravani and Megnana Gowda are not comfortable in acting.
It is the character artists Rekha V Kumar and Avinash who strikes. The cinematography of V Chandrasekhar is not adequate and music from Thomas deserved to be better.