Why did you opt for a long gap after "Yagnam"?I couldn't accept offers because I was totally involved in "Andhrudu". And the film too got delayed in production. Our efforts have turned fruitful, however, as the film has shaped up well.
I did receive scripts but they sounded repetitive. I just accepted "Ranam" with Baburao since it was an exciting script. Instead of cashing in on your newfound stardom, you seem to be very selective? That's true. I am in no hurry and keep to my own pace. I can take advances from producers but I dislike the practice. So I insist on a good story, a novel plot. Then I would choose a producer who can do justice to it and is capable of releasing it.
I have become selective because, after "Yagnam", I heard umpteen stories revolving around the theme of the Rayalaseema factionalism, but I would prefer a different backdrop. I don't want to be typecast and would like to explore varied roles. You are keeping away from soft lover-boy roles. Is it intentional?Yes. It will be difficult for audiences to accept me as someone chasing a girl with a rose. I impressed as a villain and now I want to do good roles. After "Yagnam", you have teamed up with Pokuri Baburao for "Ranam". Will you describe it as a radical film?It is also a good entertainer. It is not a hard-hitting film but conveys its message in a subtle manner.
My father made many radical films and I am also interested in associating with that genre. But you need a strong script without which it will be a wasted effort. I am yet to decide on my future projects. |